Wednesday, March 26, 2008

The Three (3) Pillars of Financial Health

The Three (3) Pillars of Financial Health
This is all about the foundation of financial success:
wealth strategy. My key purpose here is to draw a clear,
unmistakable distinction between wealth strategy and what
usually passes for "financial planning."

To be blunt, conventional financial planning is based on a
scarcity mentality. Professional financial planners will
ask you what is the minimum you can retire on. They will
help you list all the expenses you can do without when you
are older. In other words, they will plan for you to retire
poor!

The financial methodology behind this is all about savings,
not investment. The driving idea is what people call "the
miracle of compound interest". The real miracle is that
anyone can retire at all on the basis of compound interest
alone!

True wealth strategy implies that you intend to retire
rich, not poor. That is to say, as the years pass your net
worth should continue to grow and when you stop working it
should be greater than it is now. So should your income.
For most people, that isn't going to happen merely through
saving, nor through compound interest.

There are two keys to a strategy that delivers real wealth:
one is leverage, and the other is the velocity of money. In
this email, I can only introduce these core ideas. You will
find an increasing amount of information about leverage and
velocity of money at Wealth Strategy U.

Meanwhile, here are some key points to start with.

The concept of leverage is widely known, and widely
misunderstood because it is generally equated with "OPM"
— other people's money. Using OPM is just one
important example of leverage. True leverage covers just
about every area of business and life. When you fully
understand and use leverage to build wealth, you will be
making effective use of other people's money, time, ideas,
skills, labor and professional advice.

Leverage is intimately connected to velocity of money,
which is the principle of keeping your cash on the move.
This is the very opposite of the savings mentality, which
allows money to sit in one place accumulating a meager flow
of compound interest. When you apply velocity, you actively
seek new ways to deploy your capital, always with an eye to
leverage.

This portion is about tax, but in a special context.
Usually, people think about taxation separately from their
wealth building activities. Tax is seen simply as a
negative to overcome on the path to financial growth.

This is a costly mistake. Approached correctly, taxation
can be one of your most powerful engines of financial
growth. The right strategy can accelerate the increase of
both your business value and your personal net worth. It is
no exaggeration to say that the right tax methodologies can
literally double your return on investment and your overall
wealth.

How is this possible, while remaining strictly ethical and
within the law? The answer is simple to state, but takes a
tremendous amount of learning and effort to apply. To begin
with, you have to understand the immensely complex US tax
laws inside and out. More than that, you must keep current
with the endless changes that Congress brings to the
Internal Revenue Code. I am talking here about a level of
expertise, and a commitment to continuous learning, that
far exceeds that of the average CPA.

I will give you an example. Recently I was at a convention
where many CPAs were gathered and I asked one of them,
"What percentage of your tax planning has to do with
deferring taxes from the current year to a later year?" I
was expecting the number to be high, but still I was
shocked by the answer: "One hundred percent of the tax
planning we do is deferral." Let me explain what is going
on here. Like most CPAs, that CPA is deferring his clients'
taxes year by year with the expectation that when they
retire, they will be at a lower tax bracket than they are
today. In other words, he is planning for his clients to
retire poor.

With all due respect to my CPA colleagues, that's insane.
Why would anyone want to retire poor? We know from years of
testing our methodologies that you can multiply your net
worth over a few short years, by the correct application of
leverage and the velocity of money (see my last email).
Your tax strategy should be designed for you to retire rich
- in fact, richer than you are today.

What is needed is a strategy that does not defer year by
year, but installs permanent tax savings. This is where
exceptional knowledge of the Internal Revenue Code comes
in. You can only achieve such savings by understanding the
law in all its curious and anomalous details. You have to
figure how the Code is actually designed to help you reduce
taxes. Specifically, this means more than knowing about
individual tax laws; you have to master the ways different
laws interact. It's like a good doctor who knows more than
which drug to match with which disease; he or she also
understands how various drugs affect each other.

In the field of taxation, don't settle for fixing your
annual symptoms...look for the permanent cure!

In this final portion, I would like to introduce some
fundamental principles about business strategy. If you
don't own a company in the conventional sense, with
buildings and employees, please stay with me for a moment.
Even though your "business" may simply be a one-person
professional practice, or a real estate or stock investment
portfolio, the same principles apply.

What does it take to grow a business? The answer may seem
obvious, yet the principles I will share here are very
rarely applied. I know this from my experience counseling
hundreds of business owners over many years.

You must know where you stand now, and where you wish to go.

Simple, huh? Here is what is missing in 99% of privately
owned businesses I have encountered. The company may have
revenue targets (a surprising number don't even have that.)
What is missing is a valuation target. What do you want
your company to be worth to a potential buyer, and by when?
Never mind if you have no intention to sell: valuation is
the best way to "keep score" because valuation places your
business under the toughest possible scrutiny.

Perhaps you are one of the few owners who has a ready
answer to this question. Perhaps you do have an exit
strategy such as a sale or IPO, and you have a figure in
mind for the company's worth, with a future date.

Then let me ask you this: what is the value of your company
today? I'm not asking for your guess here, but for an
actual recent valuation, by an expert. Of course,
valuations are not cheap, and you might ask why you would
invest precious resources on what seems like an academic
exercise. You have no intention to sell right now, so why
spend on a valuation?

Here is the reason. You have a destination in mind - a
certain valuation by a certain date. To reach your
destination, you need to know where you are starting. Only
a present-day valuation will reveal to you the true
distance of the journey, and the ground to be covered.

Once you have conducted a valuation of your business, the
next step is what we call an "evaluation". This is an
analysis of strengths and weaknesses in every area of the
business: products, operations, management, marketing and
finances. To achieve the optimum future valuation, you will
probably need to address issues in all these areas. More
than that, you will need to create a step-by-step plan of
action that carries you through the period from now to your
target date.

The theme of valuation is remarkably rich in the insights
it can open up for any business. In this email, I have
simply introduced the idea and hopefully caught your
interest in the possibilities.


----------------------------------------------------
Tom Wheelwright is not only the founder and CEO of
Provision, but he is the creative force behind Provision
Wealth Strategists. In addition to his management
responsibilities, Tom likes to coach clients on wealth,
business, and tax strategies. Along with his frequent
seminars on such strategies, Tom is an adjunct professor in
the Masters of Tax program at Arizona State University. For
more information, please visit
http://www.provisionwealth.com

Make $27,000 in 4 minutes flat - Trading Forex

Make $27,000 in 4 minutes flat - Trading Forex
Quite a statement I think you will agree, but can it be
done?

The ruling bodies for the foreign currency off-exchange
markets are collectively the National Futures Association
(NFA) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
in the USA and in the UK the Financial Services Authority
(FSA). They do not like to see statements like the one on
this headline title.

I think that it would be fair to say that the NFA, CFTC,
and FSA are trying to make sure that people are not
encouraged to grab every penny that they can get their
hands on and dive headlong into the forex market, possibly
putting themselves and their family into financial crisis.
What they want is for the foreign exchange market to be
perceived in a balanced way, and for people to understand
the risks that are involved in trading within it.

OK, that said let us take a balanced look at the forex
market.

Most retail traders enter trades using very high leverage -
often 100:1 and sometimes more. This means that quite small
movements in the price differentials of currency pairings
will create large gains or losses in direct proportion to
the amount of leverage employed, and because of this, every
trader should be aware that it is highly possible to
sustain big losses as well as make big gains.

Of all of the participants entering the forex market, it is
widely predicted that 95% will sustain at least a partial
loss of their investment and only 5% will make a profit.

But is it possible to make $27,000 in 4 minutes flat?
Actually the answer is YES! But by the same token it is
also possible to lose $27,000 in 4 minutes flat too.

Are the governing bodies right to be so touchy about
attention grabbing headlines that seem to infer the
possibility of great gains? In my opinion they are.

The problem is an old one. The few ruthless operators that
lure in the unwary for the sole purpose of separating them
from their cash casts a shadow over both the good and bad.

The rooting out of these unscrupulous entities is to be
commended, but on the other hand, is it fair and balanced
to be forced to play down the good side of this great
industry?

I do not think that it is.

If you have funds that you wish to invest, and they are
funds that if lost would not cause you financial hardship,
then you may well wish to consider trading on the foreign
exchange because it is one of the few places that it
possible to turn a relatively modest investment into a
considerable sum of money- but not without risk.

Trading on the foreign exchange is a risk business and as
with any risk business one needs to have in place, a solid
risk management system and a very reliable trading system.
Even then a total loss of funds is still possible - as is
the possibility of making a better than average return on
your investment.

Summing up, I would not advise forex trading to the unwary
investor, nor to anyone that is already having a hard time
trying to make ends meet. But for anyone that has funds
that they would like to invest in a high risk high reward
environment then forex may just be the right place for you.

Finally, just to be clear, please read the following:-

IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE

Off-exchange foreign currency trading on margin carries a
high level of risk and may not be suitable for all
investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you
as well as for you. Before deciding to invest in foreign
exchange you should carefully consider your investment
objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite. The
possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or
all of your initial investment and, therefore, you should
not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should
be aware of all the risks associated with off-exchange
foreign currency trading and seek advice from an
independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.


----------------------------------------------------
Martin Bottomley is a full time professional forex trader,
acknowledged author, forex tutor and co-developer of forex
trading software including The Amazing Stealth Forex
Trading system.
You will find more information at:
http://www.stealthforex.com

Mortgage Loans Not Getting Closed? Your 1003 May Be The Problem

Mortgage Loans Not Getting Closed? Your 1003 May Be The Problem
During the course of my day I have occasion to talk to
mortgage loan officers. As I talk to potential new hire
LO's, quite often I find myself talking to unhappy
individuals; people who are frustrated because they just
don't understand that the mortgage industry has changed.

The last 6 months to a year, the mortgage industry is
different than it has ever been before. In fact, it is so
different; many people don't understand their job anymore.
I believe that as an LO, you have to have an understanding
of what your actual job is and at least some basic training
requirements necessary to succeed in the industry before
you can set yourself up to actually be a loan officer.

Before you can hang up a sign that says, "I'm a mortgage
broker or I'm a loan officer", ...thinking that because
it's easy to get a license and to become a loan officer,
you need to realize that in the mortgage industry it's not
always easy to know what is required of you, unless you
have the proper training.

It used to be straightforward to be a "loan officer" and
the industry formerly would support people who didn't have
a concept of what they were doing. This was because the
mortgage industry simply could not hire enough people to
take all of the mortgage applications. There were millions
and millions of loans being written and virtually any "warm
body" could write them.

The AE's helped the new LO's, their lenders helped them;
they had support systems, albeit loose support systems,
that they could call to get help.

What you have now are 236 less lenders than you had a year
or so ago and you have companies that don't even have AE's
or Reps any more because they simply can't afford to pay
them.

These companies have a fraction of the mortgage activity
that they use to have. Consequently, they have
underwriters who are completely overwhelmed by the influx
of government loans because this seems to be the product
more of our lenders are encouraging.

The real problem comes when you couple the emphasis on FHA
and VA government loans in the industry with LO's who are
trying to submit government loan applications and think
they can submit them like they did during the sub-prime
era. This is absolutely not possible.

So what you have are people who have no experience
submitting government loans that are presenting documents
to more than one lender because they may have been denied
previously. Quite often the LO needs to restructure and
re-submit the loan, basically because the loan officer
doesn't really understand how to properly submit the 1003.

They don't understand because they were never forced to
learn during the crazy days of the sub-prime marketplace.

History has thrust us into a position where our loan
officers now need to know how to originate loans. LO's all
over the country are sitting by themselves with a very
limited support system, which is made up of fewer "support"
people than it ever has had in the past.

You have mortgage company's like ours who are adding
additional support personnel for our LO's because we have
recognized the drop in the vendor support. But
unfortunately, our company is in the minority of mortgage
companies that are actually expanding and growing during
this downturn of business and can afford to provide
sufficient support personnel to assist our LO's.

For many LO's, it appears that they need some of the most
basic training, like for instance, how to simply complete
an application and the 1003. I know that it sounds silly
that it would take any training to fill out forms or to ask
questions, but in my opinion, it is even more necessary
today than in the past.

We see thousands and thousands of loans. Of those coming
from the general population of the new LO's that we hire
off the street, I would not be surprised to learn that 90%
of them send in applications to processing incomplete.

With the new, stringent requirements imposed by most
mortgage companies today, the loan officer needs to
understand that they now have to complete all fields on the
1003 and also with correct dates that comply with
regulations.

Let me provide you several examples of what we are not
seeing completed on the 1003 today;

*Years of schooling isn't completed,

*Borrowers birthdays aren't given

*Documentation necessary if there were less than 2 years of
employment is not provided

*History of ownership

*Rent history

*How many children in the family *Correct mailing address

*Correct dates that are in compliance with regulations

*The list goes on and on...

These may have been completed in the past by the lender's
Rep or AE, and they may seem like little things reflecting
back on the past days of the "Wild West sub-prime years",
but today, your declaration has to be perfect if you want
the application to get past underwriting.

In today's demanding marketplace, the HMDA section has to
be perfect and the REO has to be done, and has to be done
correctly. These are items that often may have been left
blank a year ago, and "slipped by" because someone would
have completed it for the LO.

When we were in the subprime heyday, 1003 applications
quite often were written haphazardly and unfortunately
nobody really cared because the LO had an AE doing follow
up for them.

Occasionally, a lender would force the LO to complete the
information and would end up telling the LO exactly what to
put on the 1003. The lender would end up contacting the
client for information, and in turn, create a photocopy of
the application in which they had written exactly what the
LO was to put in the blanks. They would then send it back
to LO and have the LO write in the correct data. They would
then have the borrower sign it and send it back to them.

Obviously, while we all know of companies that used to do
this, it was never an acceptable practice. I'm not implying
that it was fraudulent from the standpoint that they were
falsifying information, but they did tell the LO exactly
what they needed to put into the 1003 and we all know that
is in violation of our industry's most basic compliance
regulations.

While our company never allowed this practice, and I do not
have a lot of interaction outside of our company, I doubt
that there are any reps left who are going to provide this
"service" for the LO...that century doesn't exist any more.

Those lenders who had that level of "service", or at least,
what loan officers perceived as service, were basically
good lenders that regarded their "services" to the loan
officers as a necessary evil to get their loans closed;
that is just what it took to get the job done and mortgages
processed.

Well, let me tell you; that environment no longer exists.
What you have now are conventional lenders like Flagstar,
Chase, Citi Banks; huge conventional lenders who have never
provided these "services" because they assume that the LO
knew what their job is.

My position is that at this historical point in the
mortgage industry, we need all mortgage companies to focus
on providing their loan officers' more basic training. We
need to recognize and correct this egregious training
shortcoming BEFORE new regulations and compliance issues
are "slapped" on LO's by an industry that is already
regulated to the hilt.

If we as an industry start providing the proper support and
training, and insist on higher standards of training and
compliance, we will see more professional LO's providing
proper paperwork and as a result closing more mortgage
loans in a fraction of the time it is currently taking due
to incomplete 1003's and unfinished documentation.

After all, isn't this why we are in the mortgage business?


----------------------------------------------------
Phillip P Gilliam has been helping professionals in
software, marketing, finance and business management for
over 37 years. Phil has a wife and three daughters and
resides in Florida. He attended WSU in Dayton, Ohio and
obtained a CmfgE in Robotics. He presently is the CEO and
President of Discover Software Inc.
http://www.home-mortgage-refinancing-mortgage-company.com/

Unbiased Shows Record Amount Of Unnecessary Tax Being Paid

Unbiased Shows Record Amount Of Unnecessary Tax Being Paid
Britons are wasting billions of pounds in unnecessary tax
payments, a new set of research shows.

In the latest TaxAction study carried out by Unbiased it
was revealed that over the course of this year a total of
9.3 billion pounds will be frittered away by the public in
tax payments. Such a figure represents an increase of about
1.4 billion pounds from data recorded in 2007. Furthermore,
it is also the highest total amount of tax being wasted
since the firm began its research over a decade ago.
Figures from the firm also indicated that payments on
inheritance tax (IHT) which could be avoided are to surge
by more than 360 million pounds during 2008 to stand at 1.9
billion pounds. In addition, IHT is the most resented tax
for a fifth of consumers.

Due to making such unnecessary repayments on tax, it may be
possible that consumers are struggling to meet other areas
of demand on their spending. Such areas could include
loans, mortgage repayments, utility bills and plastic card
debts.

Overall, an estimated 34 million Britons state that they
are unhappy with the current tax system. If able to ask
Alistair Darling, the chancellor of the exchequer, any
question some 31 per cent of respondents state they would
request income tax to be modified. However, the research
also showed that more than four-fifths (82 per cent) of
people claim that they are not taking any steps to reduce
the impact of tax on their finances.

David Elms, chief executive of Unbiased, said: "Our
TaxAction report is now in its 16th year but the message
remains the same - UK taxpayers are wasting record sums in
unnecessary tax payments. And our report shows that 2008
will be no different. We estimate that each UK tax payer
will waste an average of over 290 pounds in tax payments
this year.

"We have seen a lot of talk about stealth taxes and IHT but
our figures prove that it hasn't changed the way people
deal with this tax and too much money is still being wasted
- and practically gifted to the taxman. A somewhat
surprising result, given the large amount of people who are
dissatisfied with the current tax system."

The study also showed that those living in London and
surrounding areas are losing out on the most money via
unnecessary taxation. People from Greater London were
revealed to be shelling out 782 million pounds in avoidable
tax, with this rising to 896 million pounds for residents
in the rest of the south-east of England. On the other
hand, consumers in Northern Ireland and the north of
England are wasting 165 million and 241 million pounds
respectively.

Whether consumers are worried about how much tax they are
paying or are concerned about their capacity to meet
household bills, applying for a cheap loan may be of
assistance to many. By taking out a loan, borrowers could
find that they are able to supplement spending effectively.
And with talk of a recession on the horizon a cheap loan
might help many Britons. A recent Fool study showed that
just under a fifth (17 per cent) of people think the
country is already facing economic downturn, with 74 per
cent claiming that they will have to modify their spending
habits to protect themselves against a monetary slump.


----------------------------------------------------
Abbi Rouse writes for All About Loans where visitors can
apply for self employed loans and also focuses on bad
credit loans , and loans for debt consolidation for UK
Homeowners. Visit today http://www.allaboutloans.co.uk